Since it first appeared in 1960, this review has provided a survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania ; Richard H. Fallon, Jr on sexual harassment, content neutrality and the ...
Read More
Since it first appeared in 1960, this review has provided a survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. Individual essays in the 1994 volume include articles by Craig M. Bradley on RICO and the first amendment; Bernard Schwartz on clear and present danger versus advocacy of unlawful action; William P. Marshall and Susan Gilles on the Supreme Court, the first amendment and bad journalism; Paul Finkelman on Prigg v. Pennsylvania ; Richard H. Fallon, Jr on sexual harassment, content neutrality and the first amendment; Lea Brilmayer on federalism, state authority and the preemptive power of internal law; and C. Edwin Baker on Turner Broadcasting and content-based regulation of persons and presses.
Read Less
