This book investigates what it means, and whether it is coherent to say that there is a God. The author concludes that, despite philosophical objections, many of the claims religious believers make are coherent; and that although some important claims are coherent only if the words by which they are expressed are being used in a stretched or analogical sense, this is in fact the way in which theologians have always claimed they are being used.
Read More
This book investigates what it means, and whether it is coherent to say that there is a God. The author concludes that, despite philosophical objections, many of the claims religious believers make are coherent; and that although some important claims are coherent only if the words by which they are expressed are being used in a stretched or analogical sense, this is in fact the way in which theologians have always claimed they are being used.
Read Less
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside. This book has hardback covers. Book contains pen & pencil markings. In poor condition, suitable as a reading copy. No dust jacket. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item, 600grams, ISBN: 019824410X.
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
Good in Good dust jacket. 019824410X. 302 pages. Dustjacket in plastic protective cover. Remnants and residue of sticky tape on covers, endpapers and dustjacket. With library stamps and labels. Slight wear to spine, covers, corners and dustjacket.; Ex-Library; Octavo (standard book size)
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
302. Hardcover with dust jacket. Ink underlining and markings throughout. Dust jacket is edge worn, rubbed and scuffed. Some bumping and creasing to corners and edges. 302 pages.
Seems solid. A lot of it was hard to digest. Some was interesting. Some points were about things I'd never thought about, but were obviously real philosophic issues because he brought up the primary sources of whoever proposed the opposite view.