Against the wishes of her parents and the traditions of upper-class French society, Germaine de Sta???l (1766-1817) struggled to be accepted as a serious writer. At a time when ladies wrote a little poetry and small stories, Sta???l insisted on writing about politics and philosophy. In an effort to abide by the rules of her society, she wrote in two styles--that of a woman and that of a man--but as Charlotte Hogsett points out, Sta???l's ef forts to write as a man could not disguise the woman behind the pen. Hogsett treats ...
Read More
Against the wishes of her parents and the traditions of upper-class French society, Germaine de Sta???l (1766-1817) struggled to be accepted as a serious writer. At a time when ladies wrote a little poetry and small stories, Sta???l insisted on writing about politics and philosophy. In an effort to abide by the rules of her society, she wrote in two styles--that of a woman and that of a man--but as Charlotte Hogsett points out, Sta???l's ef forts to write as a man could not disguise the woman behind the pen. Hogsett treats both the expository and fictional works in the Sta???l canon. The male canon reflects her respect for Rousseau and Chateaubriand; the female, her own courage and intelligence, for there was no one to emulate. Hogsett provides a vivid analysis of Sta???l's maturation as both woman and writer.
Read Less
