Skip to main content alibris logo

Paul on Trial: Paul, the Pharisees and the Resurrection: Proof that Paul's Doctrine of the Resurrection Was Not, in Fact, the Same as the Pharisees!

by

Write The First Customer Review
Paul on Trial: Paul, the Pharisees and the Resurrection: Proof that Paul's Doctrine of the Resurrection Was Not, in Fact, the Same as the Pharisees! - Preston D DIV, Don K
Filter Results
Item Condition
Seller Rating
Other Options
Change Currency

One of the most common arguments in support of the doctrine of a physical resurrection is that Paul said he was a Pharisee. The Pharisees believed in physical resurrection, therefore, Paul must have believed in physical resurrection. Sounds logical, right? But, the argument is fatally flawed. Ask yourself: Why Did the Pharisees want to kill Paul for his doctrine of the Resurrection, if they believed in the resurrection like he did? In other words, If Paul and the Pharisees were in full agreement on the doctrine of the ...

loading
Paul on Trial: Paul, the Pharisees and the Resurrection: Proof that Paul's Doctrine of the Resurrection Was Not, in Fact, the Same as the Pharisees! 2020, Independently Published

ISBN-13: 9798656910705

Trade paperback