The author argues for an understanding of judging that rejects foundationalism (the effort to ground legal thought on something), attempts to carve out a "middle way" between formalist and the political visions of law, and offers a reconceptual
Read More
The author argues for an understanding of judging that rejects foundationalism (the effort to ground legal thought on something), attempts to carve out a "middle way" between formalist and the political visions of law, and offers a reconceptual
Read Less
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
Good. Scuffs and fading to dust jacket. Knocks to edge of cover. Previous owner name stamp on front end page. Some pen marks throughout contents. Contents very good. Sewn binding. Cloth over boards. 392 p.
