Skip to main content alibris logo
Incompleteness in the Land of Sets - Fitting, M
Filter Results
Item Condition
Seller Rating
Other Options
Change Currency

Russell's paradox arises when we consider those sets that do not belong to themselves. The collection of such sets cannot constitute a set. Step back a bit. Logical formulas define sets (in a standard model). Formulas, being mathematical objects, can be thought of as sets themselves-mathematics reduces to set theory. Consider those formulas that do not belong to the set they define. The collection of such formulas is not definable by a formula, by the same argument that Russell used. This quickly gives Tarski's result on ...

loading
Incompleteness in the Land of Sets 2007, College Publications, London, England

ISBN-13: 9781904987345

Trade paperback