This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1892 Excerpt: ...19. Lagarde speaks of a Codex in the possession of a private individual which almost certainly produces the Recension of Palestine, Mittheilungen, ii. 56. On the difficulties which beset the restoration of the Palestinian Recension, compare Lagarde, Mittheilungen, ii. 52, 55 f. The conjecture referred to of a ...
Read More
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1892 Excerpt: ...19. Lagarde speaks of a Codex in the possession of a private individual which almost certainly produces the Recension of Palestine, Mittheilungen, ii. 56. On the difficulties which beset the restoration of the Palestinian Recension, compare Lagarde, Mittheilungen, ii. 52, 55 f. The conjecture referred to of a relationship between the Codex Vaticanus and the Hexaplar Recenshn had been suggested by Cornill in his Ezechiel, pp. 80--95. Eendal Harris (John Hopkins' University Circulars, iii. 29, 30, MarchApril, 1884) had also been led to adopt a similar opinion. This hypothesis was meanwhile refuted by Hort in The Academy (1887, IL 424), and was afterwards abandoned by Cornill himself (NGGW, 1888, pp. 194-196), since he was convinced of the fact that in B the Hebraising of proper names, which is characteristic of the Hexapla Recension ( 43), is wanting. It should also be remembered that in Jeremiah, B has not the genuinely Jewish, but the Alexandrine arrangement of the portions of the text. Cornill thinks now, with Hort, that B may rather have been a copy of a manuscript largely and preferentially used by Origen for his Septuagint text. Compare also Lagarde, Mittheilungen ii. p. 55. The dependence on the Hexapla text spoken of in the Codex Sinaiticus in the subscription to the Book of Esther is referred by Tischendorf (Novum testamentum sinaiticum, xxxiii.) to later corrections. 2. The Lucian Recension. Compare Field, Prolegomena, Ixxxiv. sqq.; Bickell in the Zeitschrift fur katholischen Theologie, 1879, p. 407 f.; Lagarde, Ankundigung, p. 26 f.; Cornill, Ezechiel, p. 65 f.; Eeckendorf, ZAW, 1887, pp. 63-66; Schuurmans Stekhoven, De Alexandrijnsche Vertaling, pp. 28-46. Westcott, History of the Canon of the New Testament, 4th ed. 1875, p. 388. When Field, ...
Read Less