This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1881 Excerpt: ...appears with two servi, but which does not otherwise present any difficulty. The result then of the above investigation is to shew, that whenever the dichotomy is by rule required between Athnach and Silluq, R'bhia mugrash is employed to mark it, --excepting only the few (clearly denned) cases, in which Great ...
Read More
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1881 Excerpt: ...appears with two servi, but which does not otherwise present any difficulty. The result then of the above investigation is to shew, that whenever the dichotomy is by rule required between Athnach and Silluq, R'bhia mugrash is employed to mark it, --excepting only the few (clearly denned) cases, in which Great Shalsheleth appears as its substitute;--and that, when further a minor dichotomy is due between R'bhia mugrash and Silluq, M'huppakh L'garmeh marks it. For the laws regulating R'bhia mugrash's own clause, I must refer to the chapter next following. The accentual division of Silluq's clause completed, it remains only to mention that, here as elsewhere, the law of transformation often comes in, and obliterates or changes the pausal accent, this coincidence accidental? We should be glad to see Shalsheleth here and there, e. g. in Ps. lxviii. 33, Job xv. 16, where it fails. On the other hand, it will disappear from nine of the above passages, e. g. Ps. vii. 6, xliv. 9, and R'bhia mugrash come instead, if we leave out nto at the end of the verse. It is to be observed that this Great Shalsheleth appears only in the position above assigned to it. It comes therefore under quite different circumstances, and with a very different value, from Shalsheleth in the prose accentuation. 7 Some Codd.--B. M. 3, 4, 7; Ox. 6, 71; K. 155--pointing xlii. 2 with Shalsheleth, and some introducing (with Ben-Bil. 1. 11) Maqqeph after "ltfN in lxvi. JO. which the above rules have fixed. Were it not for the operation of this law, we should find R'bhia mugrash introduced in every verse (except in the few cases where Athnach would come on the first word), as a subsidiary tone and necessary precursor to Silluq, --just as Tiphcha is in the prose Books. But owing to this law, it is ...
Read Less
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
PLEASE NOTE, WE DO NOT SHIP TO DENMARK. New Book. Shipped from UK in 4 to 14 days. Established seller since 2000. Please note we cannot offer an expedited shipping service from the UK.
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
PLEASE NOTE, WE DO NOT SHIP TO DENMARK. New Book. Shipped from UK in 4 to 14 days. Established seller since 2000. Please note we cannot offer an expedited shipping service from the UK.