This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1891 Excerpt: ... here the Subjunctive is the prevalent form; and, moreover, in those cases where the (Aor.) Subjunctive differs essentially in form from the Future (eX0;7, irlat, cvvfjTe, evpedfj, /cXe adwaiv, etc.), is handed down for the most part without any variation; far less frequently (and often only as an isolated variant) the ...
Read More
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1891 Excerpt: ... here the Subjunctive is the prevalent form; and, moreover, in those cases where the (Aor.) Subjunctive differs essentially in form from the Future (eX0;7, irlat, cvvfjTe, evpedfj, /cXe adwaiv, etc.), is handed down for the most part without any variation; far less frequently (and often only as an isolated variant) the Future. 1 E.g. Lev. x. 6; Deut. xxix. 13; Isa. vi. 10; Matt. vii. 6; xiii. 15 quota Luke i. 15; viii. 17; xi. 5, 7 Tdf.; xii. 58; xxii. 17 sqq.; xxii. 30; John vi. 37; x. 28; xii.40 quotn.; Phil. ii. 11 Tdf.; Rev. iii. 9; ix. 5, 6; xv. 4; xix. 7; xxii. 14, --a portion of these, however, allow themselves to be - nstrued and explained according to the analogy of the usage treated of J 151, 9 p. 382. As the Future is often used in the exegetical writings of the Church Fathers instead of the Subjunctive preserved in the N. T. text, all the doubtfully transmitted Future forms awaken the suspicion that they originally served (either as marginal glosses or elsewhere) only to explain the Subjunctives, and then subsequently passed over into a portion of the Mss. Such passages are Mark x. 15 f'urtXOrj (D iio-tAtwerat), xiii. 2 KarakvOrj (var. KaraXu&Jo-frat so Sin. without lirf), Luke xxii. 16 paya (D dayo/tai), 1 Thess. V. 3 tKvyuKriy (var. tKlv ovTai). The Future form is firmly established only in Matt. xvi. 22 ov fir eorai without var.; has preponderant authority in Luke xxi. 33 7raptA.ewovru so Sin.; while the authorities are equally divided between the two forms Sin. gives Fut. in Mark xiii. 31; Heb. x. 17 (cf. Jer. xxxviii. 34), Rev. ix. 6; xviii. 14.' Cf. besides the examples in the following paragraph. The identity in signification of the subjunctive and the Future after ov fir is established unquestionably: not only by quotations ...
Read Less
Choose your shipping method in Checkout. Costs may vary based on destination.
Seller's Description:
PLEASE NOTE, WE DO NOT SHIP TO DENMARK. New Book. Shipped from UK in 4 to 14 days. Established seller since 2000. Please note we cannot offer an expedited shipping service from the UK.